![]() |
Clinical Bacteriology Program - Overview | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOME ABOUT US CONTACT US EQA PROGRAMS RESULTS NEWSLETTER SITE MAP | ||||
|
CMPT's Clinical Bacteriology Program Established in 1982 (ISO 9001:2000 Registration 2002) CMPT provides an external quality assessment program to clinical bacteriology/microbiology laboratories.Laboratories participating in the clinical bacteriology CMPT program are separated into peer categories (A, B, C, and C1) based on a recommended program-developed work-related weighted rating scale. The rating scale is based on complexity of samples processed. Individual laboratories and provincial accreditation programs decide ‘best fit’. Please see History of Category Schema |
Challenges Clinical Bacteriology Surveys are shipped 4 times per year. Each survey consists of up to 7 simulated samples made up from the choices listed below. Only category A laboratories receive all 7 samples, category B laboratories receive 5 samples, category C laboratories receive 3 samples, and category C1 laboratories receive 2 samples per survey. Several components make up the Clinical Bacteriology Program. For specific information, please visit the specific links listed or view the challenges description page. |
|
| C. difficile Toxin challenges: 2 sendouts per year, two samples per sendout. Ships with Clinical Bacteriology program on May and November. | |
Supplementary Gram Smears Surveys are sent February and August of each year with the Clinical Bacteriology survey sendout. This program is only available to full year Clinical Bacteriology program subscribers. |
|
Participant results Participant use an on-line data entry system to report results to CMPT or fax a hard copy using CMPT report forms. Instructions for sample handling and reporting are included in each send out package. Results are available to particpants in critique format. The critiques include the expected results, comparison of results, reviews and recommendations by expert Committee (see example). Critiques are in pdf format. |
|
Grading Grading schemes are generally on a 4-point scale, and address identification, urine colony count, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, Gram stain analysis and interpretation, and importantly clinical relevancy reporting of the challenge. Participants are provided with their individual results via confidential letters, together with summaries of the collated results across all responding laboratories, sorted by category and clinical information regarding the challenge (see Critiques). End of year assessments printed in the CMPT Annual Report allow individual laboratories comparisons with means calculated from laboratories replying to all surveys. |
|
| INNOVATION, EDUCATION, QUALITY ASSESSMENT, CONTINUAL IMPROVEMENT | |